Every story includes a point of view. In accounts of historical events—whether from a social media post, newspaper article, or television broadcast—the language, tone, images, and details chosen can highlight certain perspectives while leaving others out. This often reflects the biases of the people writing, editing, and publishing the story, as well as the time period, the intended audience, and the social conditions in which it was created. Media outlets also aim to attract and keep their audience, which can influence how stories are reported. In addition, structural biases can shape reporting, such as the tendency to rely on certain types of sources while overlooking others. Because of all these influences, it is nearly impossible for any new story to be completely neutral. Even carefully created historical resources, such as those on getty.edu, may inadvertently emphasize some details while downplaying others.
In this activity, you will examine coverage of the 1968 East Los Angeles Walkouts from two different news publications to see how the same event can be portrayed in different ways through words and images. The goal is not to research the event itself, but to compare how each source presents and frames the story.
Explore George Rodriguez’s Photograph of the East Los Angeles Walkouts
Start by reading Explore Student Walkout, Boyle Heights to learn about one of George Rodriguez’s photographs documenting the East Los Angeles Walkouts in 1968.
Then, write or discuss your responses to the following questions:
- Who appears to have power in this image?
- What questions does this image raise?
- What parts of the story might be missing from the image?
Analyze and Compare the Images of the East LA Walkouts in Two Different News Articles
Look at the images in a Los Angeles Times article (scroll down to the images below the transcript) and a La Raza article about the same event. You can read the headlines, but don’t read the articles yet! Your objective is to assess what the images specifically communicate. For the images in each article, make notes about:
- Who is shown in each photo and image?
- How are the different people portrayed?
- What actions are depicted?
- What emotions do the images evoke?
- Who is shown in a powerful position? Who is shown being overpowered?
- Which image gives students more agency?
- Which image emphasizes authority, conflict, or order?
Using your answers to the questions above and the headlines (only), write a 1–2 sentence summary for each article, imagining what you think each article will say based on only these two pieces of information: headline and images.
Read about the East LA Walkouts from Two Perspectives
Next, read the text of the two articles:
As you read, make notes about the following details:
- words that describe students
- words that describe police
- words that describe school officials
- emotional or persuasive language
- important quotes that capture the reporter’s point of view
Optional Activity
Read About the East Los Angeles Walkouts to learn more about this important historical movement.
Analyze and Compare the Text of the Two Articles
Next, analyze the articles considering several elements such as audience, perspective, and who is included and excluded from the story. Use the Comparison Chart (Google Slides) to take notes and organize your ideas. Print, download, or type directly into the chart by making a copy.
Audience and Purpose
- Who appears to be the intended audience for the article? What word choices signal that?
- What seems to be the purpose of the article?
- What information is emphasized?
Perspective and Framing
- How are the student protesters portrayed?
- How are police portrayed?
- How are school officials portrayed?
- What perspectives are included and who is quoted most often?
- Which groups seem to have authority in each article?
Inclusion and Exclusion
- Whose voices are left out or not quoted at all?
- Are student voices centered or marginalized?
- What additional voices would help readers better understand the event?
Language Analysis
- Compare the headlines. What words create positive or negative impressions?
- Does either article appear more sympathetic to a particular group?
Analyze for Overall Message
Now that you’ve analyzed both the images and text in each article, and considered who is portrayed, who is left out, and whose perspective is being shared or left out in each instance, it’s time to bring it all together.
Discuss or write your responses to the following questions:
- What is the overall message in each article? How are students portrayed in each?
- In what ways are the points of view similar or different between the two articles?
- What is left out of each article? Which voices aren’t quoted or represented, and why do you think that’s the case? What are some ways that these voices are excluded?
Present Your Analysis
Put everything together into a presentation that answers the following questions. Make sure to use evidence from the images and text in each article to support your claims.
- Can two articles about the same event both be factually accurate but tell different stories?
- Which article provides a fuller understanding of the Walkouts? What perspectives are included and excluded?
- Thinking back to the photograph by George Rodriguez, what stories can a photograph tell that a written article cannot? What limitations does photography have?