Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.

Lesson Plans


Re: visual/performining arts vs. language arts

[ Thread ][ Subject ][ Author ][ Date ]
Melissa Enderle (enderlml.wi.us)
Tue, 30 Sep 97 18:12:52 -0600

Respond to this message.


>This means that we always have to schedule around "their" perceived needs vis
>a vis their children, rather than the needs of "arts" teachers vis a vis
>their children.
>
>I don't happen to believe that a 2-hour block in the morning is an absolute
>necessity for reading to be taught effectively and I think I can find some
>data to back my belief up. Research, etc. would be appreciated if you can
>point me to sources.

Your situation sounds very similar to the one the arts people are facing at my school. Like your school, students participate in a 2 or so hour block time for reading. Some have it right away in the morning, and the rest have it a little later in the morning. This means that the specialists are unable to take the majority of classes during the morning. The few classes not in reading block at a particular time are few, leaving the specialists to scrounge to find classes that they can teach during this time­ all taking from the same small pool of available classes. Mornings, therefore, are not utilized to the maximum for arts specialists, leading the principal to conclude that we have too much open space. His inflexibility to change or modify the existing block schedules prevents us from changing this perceived problem.
As you said, the principals, being very academic focused, are failing to see the beneficial role that the arts play in enhancing that "core" curriculum.
Although I have hear of no studies specifically relating to block times vs. arts education, I would encourage you to read the Business Week article which emphasized the vital role that the arts play in students' education and life.

Melissa Enderle
Enderlml.wi.us


Respond to this message.