I like the way that you handle a situation like this when grading your
students' performance. It seems fair to all of students when you set
up the rubrics. one more question:
You seemingly believe that students can't control over having or not
having talent. Do you believe that creating art requires talent? If
you do, what makes you believe a child as an "art talented"?
> First of all I teach art. Not talent. My lessons are about design
> history, criticism, philosphy, etc. The rubrics are written to
> learning those things. Their work is scored by the rubrics. The
> receive the highes scores are those who worked to meet the highest
> I do not grade students on their talent. They can control their
> they have no control over having or not having talent. Grading
> their talent would be rediculous.
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com