For lowest form of art -- how about "craft kits" - that's pretty low -
and then paintings on velvet (someone may have already mentioned that) -
how about salt maps -
I don't know if I dare go any lower
On Fri, 11 Oct 1996, Scott T Bischoff wrote:
> You asked "what the lowest form of art is..."
> To me, kitch is not the lowest form simply because it requires much
> thought, mostly justification. The lowest form to me would be that of
> reproductions or "sofa" art. True, most educated artist will not call a
> reproduction a work of art, but to the uneducated, they see anything that
> is aesthetically pleasing as art. The bothers me.
> Wanted to interject
> On Fri, 11 Oct 1996
> ELENI53 wrote:
> > Posing a question.... Is kitch Art the lowest of low art? If not, what is?
> > 'Leni