Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.

Lesson Plans


Kitch Lover

[ Thread ][ Subject ][ Author ][ Date ]
Chris Merriam (ktwnldy.az.us)
Fri, 11 Oct 1996 09:05:34 -0600


Leung Tsz Kwong wrote:
>
> >In a message dated 96-10-11 01:18:08 EDT, you write:
> >
> ><< we could use these cookie cutter images
> > to develope aesthetic discussions around high and low art >>
> >
> >The above was stated re: cookie-cutter pumpkins.... I'd use them to also
> >discuss the idea of Kitch art...
> >
> >Posing a question.... Is kitch Art the lowest of low art? If not, what is?
> >
> >'Leni
>
> I quite like the idea of asking question of this sort. Can anyone develop
> a bit more?
> like.....
> What is the highest of high art? How high is it?
> What is the highest of low art?
> What is the lowest of high art?
> Is the highest of low art higher/lower than the lowest of high art?
> What is ...(still thinking)....
>
> Leung Tsz Kwong
> Hong Kong

Uh oh.... I love the statements of humor Kitch can reflect about our
world... where do I now stand in this "Hierarchy"
Why is there a need for High vs Low Art?

Chris
Christine Merriam, Art Educator
Kayenta Intermediate School
Kayenta,AZ 86033


  • Maybe reply: Leung Tsz Kwong: "Re: Kitch Lover"
  • Maybe reply: Deborah Gilbert: "Re: Kitch Lover"
  • Maybe reply: ELENI53: "Re: Kitch Lover"
  • Maybe reply: ELENI53: "Re: Kitch Lover"
  • Maybe reply: Fimette: "Re: Kitch Lover"