Leung Tsz Kwong wrote: > > >In a message dated 96-10-11 01:18:08 EDT, you write: > > > ><< we could use these cookie cutter images > > to develope aesthetic discussions around high and low art >> > > > >The above was stated re: cookie-cutter pumpkins.... I'd use them to also > >discuss the idea of Kitch art... > > > >Posing a question.... Is kitch Art the lowest of low art? If not, what is? > > > >'Leni > > I quite like the idea of asking question of this sort. Can anyone develop > a bit more? > like..... > What is the highest of high art? How high is it? > What is the highest of low art? > What is the lowest of high art? > Is the highest of low art higher/lower than the lowest of high art? > What is ...(still thinking).... > > Leung Tsz Kwong > Hong Kong
Uh oh.... I love the statements of humor Kitch can reflect about our
world... where do I now stand in this "Hierarchy"
Why is there a need for High vs Low Art?
Christine Merriam, Art Educator
Kayenta Intermediate School