I am currently reading Studio Thinking (almost done) and caution you
to read this book thoroughly before making any decisions on using it
as a teaching tool. I am increasingly concerned about the way
prospective art educators are learning so-called best practices. I do
think this is an important book... I just have very mixed feelings
about the teacher examples and the way it is written. Please don't
get me wrong though, there are sections I do agree with... there is a
discussion on the capacity to "Envision", I found this to be
thoughtful and clear. Overall, I probably went into the book with
high expectations and just feel let down. I would be interested to
hear what others think.
PS... I learned more about best practice from Marvin Bartel's site
than I did from this book AND I always came away from Marvin's work
feeling inspired and validated.
> Hi Patricia,
> Thanks for letting me know about this book. I am familiar with the
> work of Ellen Winner and Howard Gardner. I didn't know about this
> book, however. I teach a graduate course online at Texas Woman's
> University in Denton, TX called, Visual Art, Advocacy and Cognition.
> Perhaps this book might be a good one to use with the other books
> I use by Daniel Pink, Richardson, Gardner, Efland, and Eisner.
> What do you think?
> --- On Tue, 10/14/08, Patricia Knott <email@example.com> wrote:
>> From: Patricia Knott <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Subject: Re: [teacherartexchange] Best Practices
>> To: "TeacherArtExchange Discussion Group"
>> Date: Tuesday, October 14, 2008, 11:41 PM
>> I can't wait for Kathy's book
>> in the meantime there is
>> Studio Thinking: The Real Benefits of Visual Arts Education
>> Lois Hetlan, Ellen Winner
> To unsubscribe go to
> http://www.getty.edu/education/teacherartexchange/unsubscribe.html >