On Oct 23, 2006, at 7:09 PM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> I thought the whole point about graffiti art was to "destroy"
> property to call
> attention to the art. I thought of it as a form of civil
> disobedience. To get
> permission to do grafitti art would be against the whole idea.
Perhaps graffiti art means without permission. I for one am all in
protest and I have taken part in forms of civil disobedience, but always
for a cause that I thought was worth the possible risk. Arrest and
for a decent cause is a choice worth making. But painting a wall in
of night for the thrill of it, is akin to dumping out houses on
Woody, Retired in Albuquerque