Re: Pant by Numbers

From: Patricia Knott (pknott_at_TeacherArtExchange)
Date: Tue Oct 22 2002 - 19:14:56 PDT

• Next message: gail kizis: "Re: Ideas for contour line sketch"
• Previous message: Olejarz2_at_TeacherArtExchange: "Re: Why do we have to take art?"
• Maybe in reply to: craig roland: "Pant by Numbers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Not too long ago I would have said phooey to this, but looks like that dog
has more enthusiasm than most of my students. At least the dog can't be
accused of being derivative.
I suspect some serious redefining of art is in order or else..

"We are all just monkeys with cameras"

Patty
> From: craig roland <rolandc@ufl.edu>

> Subject: Pant by Numbers
>
> Check this out:
> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/10/1021_021021_dogswithjobs2.html
>
> The world is going to the dogs!
> Craig

---

• Next message: gail kizis: "Re: Ideas for contour line sketch"
• Previous message: Olejarz2_at_TeacherArtExchange: "Re: Why do we have to take art?"
• Maybe in reply to: craig roland: "Pant by Numbers"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]