In a message dated 10/29/00 6:07:37 PM, Heyjude5270@aol.com writes:
<< How do you handle grading unfinished work
in circumstances such as this? >>
Unfinished work is unfinished work. If the students had adequate time, and
they were goofing off, then they need to suffer the consequences for not
finishing. You could give partial credit, if they deserved it, but I wouldn't
come out of the 70's. It's not fair to the ones who worked hard and finished
to "give" grades to those that didn't. That just perpetuates the idea that
it's not a real class anyway.
Reatha
From owner-artsednet Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:05:28 -0500
Return-Path: <owner-artsednet>
Received: from web1.pub.getty.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost.getty.edu with SMTP (Lyris Server version 3.0); Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:08:05 -0700
Received: from e006000n0.anchorage.k12.ky.us ([170.181.179.12])
by web1.pub.getty.edu (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA11496
for <artsednet@web1.pub.getty.edu>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 05:08:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by E006000N0 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10)
id <4W7675XG>; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:05:31 -0500
Message-ID: <B1825060DCD1D011B61400805F26883EA56C5A@E006000N0>
From: "Sears, Ellen" <ESears@Anchorage.k12.ky.us>
To: "'artsednet@web1.pub.getty.edu'" <artsednet@web1.pub.getty.edu>
Subject: Pageant of masters - Smithsonian
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:05:28 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.10)
Content-Type: text/plain
the new Smithsonian just came - great article on the Pageant of Masters (
works of art are recreated with human subjects) -
Ellen
