Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
Marvin P Bartel wrote:
> Artsedneters,
> I'm sorry if this has been discussed before, but I am wondering if any of
> you know of any relevant research of teaching experience related to teaching
> observation drawing at a very young age. If so, please respond to me or to
> the group.
>
> Background:
> Brain research tells us that there is a limited window of only a few years
> before the brain is hardwired and it becomes much harder to learn some types
> of stuff. In music, if the study and the listening doesn't start when
> children are young enough, they never learn good hearing sensitivity to
> pitch. Those who have perfect pitch are likely to come from homes where
> music is important. Languages are easy to learn when children are learning
> to speak because they hear and say the sounds easily without thinking. This
> gets much more difficult after they are older and the brain has lost its
> flexibility to be programmed. Some are also finding greater intelligence for
> those who have heard and studied music at a young age.
>
> The question for us:
> When is the ideal window of opportunity for learning to see and to draw?
> What if children were given formal lessons in seeing and drawing in the same
> way they are given formal Suzuki violin lessons when they are only 3 or 4.
> Is anybody studying this in seeing and drawing? Does anybody know of any
> "Suzuki" drawing teachers? Is any research being done related to the best
> age (most optimal) to learn observational drawing? Are their any programs or
> studies that work with very young children to help them discover their
> seeing/drawing potentials while their brains are still malleable?
>
> We all know of a few children who happen to become very good at
> observational drawing. Might this be because they happened to practice and
> learn it at the right time (younger than we now suspect) during their brains
> development? If we could prove this, how would it change the way we teach art?
>
> Reading and writing is universally taught beginning at age 5 or 6 and
> sometimes younger. Why don't art teachers universally teach observational
> drawing at a certain age? Why do the National Visual Arts Standards dance
> around this issue without ever mentioning observational drawing skill as a
> measurable standard of seeing ability? Isn't seeing and being able to draw
> an important way of knowing and communicating about our world? The Standards
> certainly cover many other important issues, but this one seems conspicuous
> be its absence.
>
> Again, if you have tried teaching observation drawing at the preschool age,
> what did you learn? If you know of research along these lines, please
> respond. Thanks.
> Marvin
> ***********************************************
> Marvin Bartel, Ed.D., Professor of Art
> Goshen College, 1700 South Main St., Goshen IN 46526
> Office (219) 535-7592 Fax (219)535-7660
> Studio (219) 533-0171
> ***********************************************
> My October, 98 exhibition:
> http://www.goshen.edu/~marvinpb/10-98p1.htm
> Fax (219) 535-7660
> e-mail marvinpb
> http://www.goshen.edu/art/
> ***************************
> http://www.bartelart.com/acorn.htm
> "Plant trees. It's a good thing."