Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.

Lesson Plans


Fw: No Subject

[ Thread ][ Subject ][ Author ][ Date ]
Rodney and Barbara Boville (rboville)
Sun, 30 May 1999 12:22:37 -0500


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_008D_01BEAA97.1A97EB60
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----Original Message-----
From: FXSTB316 <FXSTB316>
To: brucebfg <brucebfg>; DaleHe
<DaleHe>; LISA2072 <LISA2072>; hosegod
<hosegod>; potts <potts>; rboville
<rboville>; tanya.brad
<tanya.brad>
Date: Friday, May 28, 1999 11:58 PM
Subject: Fwd: No Subject

>
>

------=_NextPart_000_008D_01BEAA97.1A97EB60
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Return-Path: <Keith.Plaster.us>
Received: from rly-yd04.mx.aol.com (rly-yd04.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.4]) by
air-yd05.mail.aol.com (v59.24) with SMTP; Tue, 25 May 1999 08:56:59
-0400
Received: from doamail01.doa.state.wi.us (doamail01.doa.state.wi.us
[165.189.90.64]) by rly-yd04.mx.aol.com (vx) with SMTP; Tue, 25 May
1999 08:56:51 -0400
Received: by DOAMAIL01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
id <LP71D19K>; Tue, 25 May 1999 07:56:47 -0500
Message-ID: <E710150A0520D211AF6B0010E36030AE7563F6.wi.us>
From: "Plaster, Keith" <Keith.Plaster.us>
To: "Brian Fried (E-mail)" <bfried4426>,
"Darlene Plaster (E-mail)" <darleneplaster>,
"Dennis Plaster (E-mail)" <DPlaster>,
"Jon Rindfleisch (E-mail)" <ezcue1>,
"Lon Kraft (E-mail)"
<fxstb316>,
"Scott Sisco (E-mail)" <mssisco>
Subject:
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 07:56:46 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>Here's another bit about the Email Legislation...
>
>>>>> >>Dear Internet Subscriber:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>Please read the following carefully if you intend to
>>>>> >>stay online and continue using email: The last few
>>>>> >>months have revealed an alarming trend in the
>>>>> >>Government of the United States attempting to quietly
>>>>> >>push through legislation that will affect your use of
>>>>> >>the Internet. Under proposed legislation the U.S.
>>>>> >>Postal Service will be attempting to bilk email users
>>>>> >>out of "alternate postage fees". Bill 602P will permit
>>>>> >>the Federal Govt to charge a 5 cent surcharge on
>>>>> >>every email delivered, by billing Internet Service
>>>>> >>Providers at source. The consumer would then be
>>>>> >>billed in turn by the ISP. Washington D.C. lawyer
>>>>> >>Richard Stepp is
>>>>> >>working without pay to prevent this legislation from
>>>>> >>becoming law. The U.S. Postal Service is claiming that
>>>>> >>lost revenue due to the proliferation of email is
>>>>> >>costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You
>>>>> >>may have noticed their recent ad campaign "There is
>>>>> >>nothing like a letter". Since the average citizen
>>>>> >>received about 10 pieces of email per day in 1998, the
>>>>> >>cost to the typical individual would be an additional
>>>>> >>50 cents per day, or over $180 dollars per year, above
>>>>> >>and beyond their regular Internet costs. Note that
>>>>> >>this would be money paid directly to the U.S. Postal
>>>>> >>Service for a service they do not even provide. The
>>>>> >>whole point of the Internet is democracy and
>>>>> >>non-interference. If the federal government is
>>>>> >>permitted to tamper with our
>>>>> >>liberties by adding a surcharge to email, who knows
>>>>> >>where it will end. You are already paying an
>>>>> >>exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureacratic
>>>>> >>efficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a
>>>>> >>letter to be
>>>>> >>delivered from New York to Buffalo. If the U.S. Postal
>>>>> >>Service is allowed to tinker with email, it will mark
>>>>> >>the end of the "free" Internet in the United States.
>>>>> >>One congressman, Tony Schnell (r) has even suggested a
>>>>> >>"twenty to forty dollar per month surcharge on all
>>>>> >>Internet service" above and beyond the government's
>>>>> >>proposed email charges. Note that most of the major
>>>>> >>newspapers have ignored the story, the only exception
>>>>> >>being the Washingtonian which called the idea of email
>>>>> >>surcharge "a useful concept who's time has come"
>>>>> >>March 6th 1999 Editorial) Don't sit by and watch your
>>>>> >>freedoms erode away!
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>Send this email to all Americans on your list and tell
>>>>> >>your friends and relatives to write to their
>>>>> >>congressman and say "No!" to Bill 602P.
>>>>>
>>>>> >>Kate Turner
>>>>> >>Assistant to Richard Stepp, Berger, Stepp and Gorman
>>>>> >>Attorneys at Law 216 Concorde Street, Vienna, Va.

------=_NextPart_000_008D_01BEAA97.1A97EB60--


  • Reply: John & Sandra Barrick: "Re: Fw: No Subject"
  • Reply: Skiart: "Re: Fw: No Subject"