Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
Re: RE>Re- RE>Re- RE>artsednet-
[ Thread ][ Subject ][ Author ][ Date ]Ann Carolan
Mon, 03 May 1999 15:25:49 +0000
I agree with all you points except One. You don't like the government telling
you what to do. What about when they tell you to wear a seatbelt; or to drive
slow in a n area around the school. Where do you draw the line on what the
government tells us to do. For me, if it is reasonable, just, fair, if it
protects people, then I darn well better respect it like it or not. And isn't
the government just trying to protect our children from nuts like those 2 kids
Thanks, I appreciate the dialogue, also.
> a message from cathy . . .
> I agree with you on the weapons that are intended to kill . . people. i
> do not like the semi-automatic guns either, but I don't want the
> government to tell me what I can and cannot own. I wouldn't own one
> myself. I appreciate your dialog. This is how people start understanding
> one another and their points of view. I advocate guns under lock and key,
> whether or not children are around. And . . when children are around and
> or shooting for at targets or for hunting , they are supervised, have a
> gun safety class, and most of all talked to.