Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
1) Each "Evidence Kit" provides clues or evidence describing a nearby
location. If you discovered these items two hundred years from now, how
would you go about analyzing the objects? Explain the process or write
down the steps you used to make inferences about the site.
2) Hypothesize the function of each object found in the "Evidence
Kit." What type of information did each artifact provide? (You may
want to record this information in a chart or on a spreadsheet.) What
piece of evidence was crucial to the investigation? What evidence
assisted least in the process?
3) Do the objects in the "Evidence Kit" tell you anything about the
values of the group of people who made or used them? What speculation
could you make about their religious, political, ethical, social, or
4) What do the properties of the objects (color, size, etc.) tell us
about their aesthetic value? How do these aesthetic values relate to
their other values? (For example, the mummification of individuals
tells us a great deal about the political and religious ideals of the
time. The design of the tombs tell us something about their aesthetic
values and the ways the aesthetic values connected to their political
and religious values.)
5) Based upon the items and descriptions found in the "Evidence Kit",
write a paragraph describing how the particular site looked.
6) Looking at the information relating to Trajan's Forum
what conclusions can you draw about Roman life? Do you think this
structure represents a typical building of the time? Where did ordinary
people live and what were their homes like?
7) What conclusions can be drawn by future generations about our
culture from the evidence they are likely to find? Do you think people
in the future would be more likely to learn more about us from our
artworks than from our garbage dumps? Why or why not? Explain your
Thanks for any input you can provide!