Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
If we are going to use objects like the ones we have been talking about to
teach about different culture I certainly feel we have to do it somewhat
like Sharon Hill describes it:
"The key concept behind the object is what is
<important, not the object itself. For example, if
<students copy Egyptian iconography in making death
<masks, what have they learned? Wouldn't a higher level
<of thinking and understanding be reached if the
<students looked at cultural examples and then applied
<the concepts of time, permanence, and heritage to
<their own experience? They could develop masks or
<images that interpretted their ideas about what they
<would like future viewers to know about them. What
<aspects of their lives would they like to be
<"eternal"?
<If students can examine key concepts and develop
<essential questions and then interpret them visually,
<I believe we would have a more valid learning
<experience and not be subject to rote copying of
<cultural imagery."
I feel the most important issue in all this is to respect the art and
cultures of all people and try not at all to simplify something we might
not understand and not copy something just because we find it "cute or nice
for children to make".