Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
One of Stewart Davis' own interpretations of the Eggbeater series said,
"Sometimes a person gets tired of painting landscapes. Then he paints people...
Sometimes an uninteresting subject may be stimulated as an interesting one.
One day I set up an egg beater in my studio and got so interested in it that
I nailed it on a table and kept it there to paint. I called the pictures Eggbeater
number such and such, because it was from the eggbeater that the pictures
took their impulse."
Another interpretation by an art historian claims, "His intention was to choose
the prominent visual images associated in his mind with a subject and convert these
images into pictorial language as a set of primary planes. He followed this step with
the addition of secondary forms that conformed to the design established by the
Another historian has stated, "From the vantage point of the 1990s,
Stuart Davis' idiosyncratic paintings seen as a distant from the Cubist models that
were their principle inspiration as they are from the Abstract Expressionist works
that historically have overshadowed them."
And yet another interpretation, "Percolators, mouthwash bottles,
light bulbs, eggbeater and the like became surrogates for the life of
the streets, brought within reach of the hand. Their very familiarity
and ordinariness allowed Davis to concentrate on color and structure,
while at the same time their obvious difference from traditional still
life objects made them potent symbols of modernism."