Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: pknott@enter.net

From: Patricia Knott (pknott_at_TeacherArtExchange)
Date: Mon Mar 24 2003 - 18:08:06 PST

• Next message: Mcracker_at_TeacherArtExchange: "Re: weather in Minn."
• Previous message: Maggie White: "Re: cone not melting when firing"
• Maybe in reply to: pknott_at_TeacherArtExchange: "A washingtonpost.com article from: pknott@enter.net"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

That's my question.
I think it's not realistic, or abstract or maybe not even finely crafted.
But it is timeless and an expression and should be a mirror of something.
I just thought this a curious, simplistic article to be in the Washington
Post and yet the last two statements say a lot about the myths we battle.
Patty

> Subject: Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: pknott@enter.net
>
> So if none of those things mean good art then what is good art?
>
> Sky in NJ
>
>

---

• Next message: Mcracker_at_TeacherArtExchange: "Re: weather in Minn."
• Previous message: Maggie White: "Re: cone not melting when firing"
• Maybe in reply to: pknott_at_TeacherArtExchange: "A washingtonpost.com article from: pknott@enter.net"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]