That's my question.
I think it's not realistic, or abstract or maybe not even finely crafted.
But it is timeless and an expression and should be a mirror of something.
I just thought this a curious, simplistic article to be in the Washington
Post and yet the last two statements say a lot about the myths we battle.
> Subject: Re: A washingtonpost.com article from: email@example.com
> So if none of those things mean good art then what is good art?
> Sky in NJ