One of MY personal favorite articles is one the Carolyn Roberts found in USA
TODAY. I think it's important (and interesting) enough to bear repeating.
Here it is....Toodles....Bunki
There's an interesting article in the USA Weekend that is included in our
newspaper today (Dec 28-30) entitled "Physicians probe paintings before
First-year medical students are making trips to the art museum before
making rounds. Why? So they can become better dianosticians, according to
professor Irwin Braverman of Yale, where an art-in-medicine course is now
Sleuthing skills are a must in determining what is wrong with a patient
(even Sherlock Holmes relied on Dr. Watson) but generally are acquired on
after years of seasoning, says the professor, who wanted to see if studying
art could help build deductive skills early in doctors' training.
To test his theory, he took a group of students to the Yale Center for
British Art, "We wanted them to explore several possibilities in paintings,"
Braverman says. For example: In Henry Wallis' "The Death of Chatteron"
(image is shown in the paper), "It wasn't enough to say, "The man looks
dead.' They had to say, 'It's because of his abnormal posture, or his skin
looks (blue, from a lack of oxygen).' We wanted concrete visual evidence."
Students looked for clues...smoke rising from a candle, a clenched fist, an
empty vial on the floor, the time of day.
Students who took the first class scored 56% higher than students who
did not. Competing medical schools have taken note: Cornell has added a
similar course, and other universities, including Brown, have expressed
Says Braverman: "We want our students to learn this before they learn
bad habits. There are no short cuts. We want them to get in the habit of
seeing what they're look at."
Give this article to those who think that art is not important enough to
allocate enough money to buy the necessary art supplies, art prints, etc.
needed to teach a decent program.