Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
I've been thinking about this for a long time and would like some of your
input. It's about DBAE. I think this has been a wonderful thing, mostly. I
have always included art history and criticism and even some aethetics in my
lessons and because of DBAE I'm doing it even more now. However, I still
think the balance should lean towards art production. At the Getty site they
have a lesson that is used as a sample which includes lots of art history,
criticism, etc. Then they suggest that the students make a poster with a
drawing of an African mask with written explanations describing and explaining
it. This sounds like a social studies project to me. When we make African
masks we make them out of papier mache and then mix earth colors in tints and
shades and paint them and then decorate them with beans, nuts, shells, raffia
and feathers. Yes, we spend about one 45 minute art period researching the
masks ( a mix of slides, videos, lecture, visuals,etc.) But the rest of the
project takes about 6 - 8 weeks. This is providing that their once a week art
class is not cancelled due to assemblies, concert practice,etc. Then it can
really drag on. NJ is testing the students in 4th grade on art now. They are
expected to know a lot of information and be able to write about it. So they
will need to take notes in class and try to make up what they've missed during
absences. The teachers and students are very stressed out about all this.
There is test anxiety in the air.
I find that when I talk too much in class (and of course I think I do it in a
very interesting way) that the children can't wait to DO something. They say
OK, OK but when are we going to DO something? They have to listen, write and
take notes in their other classes. They love art because they get to DO
things in my class. I see the time coming when we'll get to do one little
token project every marking quarter because the rest of the time is taken up
with cricism, history, aesthetics and then testing to make sure they "got
it". I even heard about a parent whose son is in middle school. He only
brought home one little clay project during the entire last SEMESTER. The
parent complained to the teacher who said, "I wish we had time to make more
things but I only have time to teach art history now because the students will
be tested on it in eighth grade. I have to prepare them for the test." Any
one care to respond or reassure me that I'm overreacting?
Thanks,
Sky
---
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Mar 18 2000 - 06:14:19 PST