Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
Nancy,
I agree with your defense of NAEA. Since becoming a board member, I am
amazed at the amount of work and the national level involvement of the NAEA
board. I have seen the professionalism of art education grow in leaps and
bounds in the past twenty years and I feel that it is a result of NAEA and
the power of its members.
The NAEA is respected by other professional organizations and has been
praised for proactive stance to educational policy and reform.
In NAEA the power is it's individual members working in the trenches.
Debi Barrett-Hayes
NAEA Secondary Division Director
In a message dated 3/8/00 10:02:16 AM, walkup writes:
<< I must respectfully disagree with the negative comments about NAEA and,
instead, afirm that the organization does work for the benefit of teachers
and students. As a long-term NAEA member, I know the efforts that have been
and continue to be made. (The development of national standards for the arts
resulted from NAEA's collaboration with other national arts organizations is
just one example.)
I do believe that the success of an organization is a result of the
involvement of its members. I know firsthand that almost every position held
in NAEA is voluntary, not paid. I also know that each of you can contribute
to NAEA's efforts. If you have suggestions about a list serv at NAEA, e-mail
your ideas to them. We were fortunate to have the support of the Getty for so
long (and I certainly want it to continue) but let's give NAEA a chance, too.
Regards,
Nancy Walkup >>
---
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 08 2000 - 08:56:40 PST