Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
**************************************
Always with the questions Larry asked:
what does she mean? In what way(s) do we need to teach
differently to get students to think differently and, presumably, better?
And how do we define 'better' thinking? What's wrong with the way(s) kids
think now?
**************************************
Given the status of high school graduates' thinking level (just read the
papers), it appears (as well as documented in educational literature) that
students are not able to think on a higher order level. This is cause for
change in teaching techniques: If we teach differently (utilizing more of
the taxonomy of learning), students might have an opportunity to think
differently (using more of their brain power) to come up with more creative,
relevant solutions to questions in the class room.
Consider the way many 13 year old American students dealt with a problem
that appeared in the National Assessment of Education Progress. The
question was: "An army bus holds 36 soldiers. If 1,128 soldiers are being
bused to their training site, how many busses are needed? Divide 1,128 by
36, you get 31 with a remainder of 12, meaning it would take 32 buses. Most
students did the division correctly, but fewer than one out of four got the
question right. The most common answer was "31 remainder 12.
If students were given more opportunities to think this way, they might not
be ambushed by this questioning strategy. If they are to be able to call to
mind this skill, they ought to have some practice with it so they recognize
it when they see it.
Of course as art teachers, we use higher order, interpretive skills all the
time
~~~giggle~~~
-=deb=-
---
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 01 2000 - 17:57:10 PST