Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
>
> So far I have read 3 responses to your question, and I agree with all of
> them. Art is not "do page 46 for homework, please" course work (and
> hopefully math is no longer like that either). I believe meaning is
> constructed both by doing AND by interacting, so that children encounter
> more information on which to build more knowledge.
>
> Sit back? I don't think I sit down, ever. I can't believe someone would
> want/ expect a teacher (regaradless of subject matter) to abstain from
> monitoring student progress. Personally, the 1:1 interactions are my
> favorite part of teaching... coaching and coaxing students to discover
> new ideas, processes, techniques, etc., that enhance their work. Let
> them discover, but be their guide, know what I mean?
>
> Keep up with your style. It has class (both meanings) written all over
> it!
>
> M.Grosspietsch
>
> Gail1611 wrote:
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> > I've had this put to me twice by 2 bosses so I guess I need some feed
back on
> > what you all think? The question is this: You've presented a new
project, set
> > up directions, answered questions, and have materials ready. Now do
you
> > expect to basically sit back and let the kids do the project all on
their
> > own ? I feel going around the room and helping kids(grades 1-5),
making
> > suggestions, asking them to re-think a process he or she is doing helps
my
> > students to do a better and more thorough job. My 2 bosses feel I work
too
> > hard and should let the kids discover it all on their own. What do
you
> > think is the best way for the kids to learn and develop? And it
doesn't have
> > to be either of these ways. Thanks for your input. Gail