According to a lot of the research, students prefer
the traditional approach to teaching. They don't like
student centered learning or constructivist
approaches. Could it be that students don't really
want to learn? How has this happened? Is it really
just because the teacher hasn't found a way to
motivate the student? Could it be that no amount of
motivation can make some students learn? Is it always
the teacher's responsibility for helping students want
These are serious questions. I am not whining,
although it may sound like that. I want to know what
the rest of you think. Is our culture producing
people who are no longer intellectually curious? My
question is not about who is at fault. I am trying to
ascertain the processes by which students become dull
and uninterested in life...they don't grab for life!
They slide around the outside wall. They don't seize
the day! (Carpe Diem). How does our society go about
helping people wake up!
What are your thoughts?
--- Patricia Knott <email@example.com> wrote:
> Why do kids turn off to learning?
> It's interest --------- student directed learning
> We hold so dearly to notions of what we think kids
> should know.
> It's not so dear to THEM
> I'm an old fogie and I would wish every kid held my
> notions-- but
> it's just not the case.
> When I write curriculum I labor and labor over the
> big questions--
> and it's those big questions that are the teachers
> chore to find and
> elaborate on.
> What do I care about that I can find a way to make
> them care about???
> The big questions are very important.
> They care diddly squat about what we have cherished
> they care about the immediate and the immediate
> means to make
> the expression in what ever means or ways
> What we need to care about is how we can keep up
> with the immediate
> means of expression. Boredom pervades when the
> teacher can not
> find the ways and means to engage. In the ever fast
> world of
> communication ------------ old notions are OLD.
> We can profess all we want about the traditional,
> if we don't get on top of the ways they make
> then then
> all the tradition is for naught.
> I'm fed to death with lessons that don't address
> just where the kids
> are within the world that needs addressing. Just
> where the world is
> and where they are.
> We need to give up some stuff in order to keep them
> in art.
> On Jun 18, 2007, at 6:17 PM, Diane Gregory wrote:
> > Using the Big Question approach can lead to
> > and critical thinking. But I see that this
> > always work.
> > However, I think there are some underlying
> > that all teachers encounter. I run into this all
> > time. Sometimes my students don't want to learn.
> > Sometimes they are too stressed or too overwhelmed
> > too bored to put forth the effort.
> > I wonder how this has started? At what point do
> > students get turned off to learning and why? What
> > happening and why?
> > I have noticed that even when good teachers pose
> > creative questions, or provide creative
> activities, I
> > have noticed that some students do what I call,
> > around the outside wall." They don't seem to
> > They seem lifeless, uninspired and unengaged.
> > don't seem interested. This attitude can become
> > pervasive and can negatively affect the entire
> > educational climate.
> > Why does this happen? How does this happen? What
> > teachers do about it? How can we change the
> system so
> > that this happens less?
> > I see this all the time at the college level and I
> > suspect it happens at the K-12 level. What do you
> > guys think? What is causing this anasthesia?
> > Cheers,
> > Diane
> > --- firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> I am interested in the the thread about students
> >> copying work rather that working from the actual
> >> thing or
> >> coming up with their own ideas. Along the same
> >> lines, I have been interested in getting students
> >> think
> >> of ideas of interest to them personally, or more
> >> importantly, just to think, be creative. I have
> >> toying
> >> with the idea of using the interview questions
> >> by James Lipton on Inside the Actor's Studio. I
> >> believe they were developed by a man named
> >> Pevot (spelling?) Anyway, I thought it would be
> >> a good starting point at the beginning of the 9
> >> weeks to help students look at themselves a
> >> bit
> >> closer. Does anyone have other ideas for
> >> creativity in middle school students?
> >> A work in progress,
> >> Vicki
> >> ---
> >> To unsubscribe go to
http://www.getty.edu/education/teacherartexchange/unsubscribe.html > >>
> > ---
> > To unsubscribe go to
> To unsubscribe go to