Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
I didn't say I didn't like it...I was just asking if they would be
considered to "have talent" according to the definition that you
stated...which is:
............................................
There's a simple explanation for the term *talent* as applied to visual
art and here it is:
It's the innate ability of an individual to reproduce a 3-dimensional
object on a 2-dimensional surface--the degree of accuracy with which the
object is reproduced determines the degree of talent.
............................................
I question whether their work has a "degree of accuracy" as depicted from a
3-D object. Many would question that...right?
Sincerely,
Carolyn
>croberts wrote:
>>
>> How about Basquiat, Jaune Quick-to-See Smith, and others whose work is
>> similar....did they have talent?
>
>You may dislike the work of these artists but as a teacher you must make
>an attempt to understand their art since it's recognized as excellent by
>so many knowledgeable people. There are many books on Basquiat
>especially, explaining his esthetics---
>
>Best wishes,
>joseph
---
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 24 2000 - 06:50:41 PDT