Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
Michael Keller wrote:
> That may have been true ten years ago, but that was also when "computer art"
> looked like it was made on the computer. Sort of like the early days of the
> synthesizer. Now it's more valuable if the art looks like it's done by a
Henry chimes in:
Hmmmmmmm. And I just spent the past few nights with a new genetic
algorithm paint program. Last night I churned out 1700+ images "breeding"
landscapes... desertscapes, seascapes and sunsets... out of a program
designed more for abstracts.