Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
Then, the class visited the Museum of Modern Art in Fort Worth and saw =
an exhibit by a living painter named Sir Howard Hodgkin. The museum =
thought highly of his work and considered him an "important painter". =
His work is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars per painting. The =
other art teachers and I were standing in amazement while we looked at =
these paintings as the docent explained why these were masterpieces. No =
one said anything, but suddenly I realized I considered these paintings =
horrible and from what I had been learning the previous three days, =
would not get a high school senior a top scholarship or get him a rating =
high enough to get the college credit he was seeking by taking the =
Advanced Placement Course at his or her high school.
These paintings were clearly an example of the Emperor's new cloths. In =
other words, a respected collector or museum simply declared this =
painter important. None of the top collectors or museums will dare =
question the quality of the paintings because they all have praised many =
of the same artists and it would bring all of their opinions into =
question.=20
This one event has forever changed my point of view and because of it, I =
have begun to investigate the contemporary art market for the upper tier =
painters.
I know what I am saying is controversial, but I am simply no longer =
content to blindly accept the opinions of noted collectors and museums =
as to what Is an important work of art and why. I believe there is too =
much room for vested interests and greed on the part of those who are =
basically "setting the standards of taste" for an entire art form.
What do you think?,
Vance McSwain
vmcswain