Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.

Find Lesson Plans on getty.edu! GettyGames

Re: [teacherartexchange] WSJ Article

---------

From: Barbara Marder (marder621_at_TeacherArtExchange)
Date: Fri Jul 02 2010 - 04:05:01 PDT


I just read a great article and am quoting the following passage from it
as well as the link to the article that is a review of current exhibits.

Is making art objects regressive? Does making work that sells amount to selling out? How valid is self-expression in art? Is there nothing left to do but appropriate, restage and rearrange? Has art become primarily a mirror of larger contexts, whether social, historical or architectural?

Luckily art is more about questions than answers, and in any case cultural clash is always invigorating — especially if it reduces the penchant for simple dualities and oppositions. What at first appears to be an either-or choice in these two shows starts to blur once you spend time with them, as the underlying messiness of both art and life seeps through

from todays NY Times
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/02/arts/design/02parreno.html?_r=1&th=&adxnnl=1&emc=th&adxnnlx=1278068560-gYIPuXlcdgpY+1hcNAWt0A

Barbara

On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:11 AM, Leslie O'Shaughnessy wrote:

> Frankly, this is exactly the kind of thing that drew me into teaching art: current issues and politics.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 30, 2010, at 9:39 PM, Woody Duncan <woodyduncan@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> There is a great discussion going on here. Hopefully others will join in on this topic
>> so we can get a variety of perspectives on the inclusion of social and political content
>> in some art lessons.
>> Woody
>>
>> On Jun 30, 2010, at 7:21 PM, Barbara Marder wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Woody,
>>>
>>> What seems to be the crux of the argument is expressing a vision without an artwork.
>>>
>>> The problem with the "new" social justice art is that somehow we are skipping the art making.
>>>
>>> So why are we calling it "art"?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Barbara - "divisiveness of art educators" - that's a strange way to put it. Artists have opinions and they
>>>> do voice them - that's what democracy is all about. If teachers ask students to voice social content in
>>>> their art, the teacher should not direct the content - that is the students choice. The teacher should
>>>> prepare the students to be accepting of others who have diverse and different views. Art is powerful
>>>> and students should be made aware that one choice is to use their art for social change or to maintain
>>>> the status quo. I do not do political or social art but I respect and applaud those who do.
>>>> Woody
>>>>
>>
>> Woody, Retired in Albuquerque
>> mailto:woodyduncan@comcast.net
>>
>> Join me as a friend on facebook:
>> http://www.facebook.com/woody.duncan1?ref=name
>>
>> Read My 2010 May Blog:
>> http://www.taospaint.com/WoodysBlog10/May.html
>>
>> Read My 2010 June Blog:
>> http://www.taospaint.com/WoodysBlog10/June.html
>>
>> 35 Quality Middle School Art Lessons
>> http://www.taospaint.com/QualityLessons.html
>>
>>
>> ---
>> To unsubscribe go tohttp://www.getty.edu/education/teacherartexchange/unsubscribe.html
>>
>
> ---
> To unsubscribe go tohttp://www.getty.edu/education/teacherartexchange/unsubscribe.html

---
To unsubscribe go to 
http://www.getty.edu/education/teacherartexchange/unsubscribe.html