I have just finished only my first year of teaching, and I am unsure,
too. I have some thoughts on this topic, though. If all students are
to learn about the same ten (or even one hundred) artists, then how are
we, as teachers, exemplifying the value of diversity or creative
thinking? Our society tends to create an "industry of fame," and I
think that our yearning to create a "top ten list" reflects that.
However, when thinking about the growth and learning of an individual,
I'm not sure that a list of "must-see" artists contributes to that goal.
On the flip side, in other academic disciplines, there are basic
foundational "musts." Perhaps a "top ten list" serves as the
foundation for creative learning and growth in art history and/or art?
Maybe these are the rules that one must learn, before breaking them?
On Thursday, July 14, 2005, at 01:11 AM, Diane C. Gregory wrote:
> If I could determine my own
> goals and ignore the state mandated curriculum, I would say that it
> matter as long as the concepts we are learning about in a student
> learning environment are being addressed. I guess I would ask the
> what they would like to learn. But maybe this is too lose. The more
> I teach
> the less I know and the more I teach the more unsure I am that we know
> what we
> are doing.