Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
[I am most hesitant to use the term descriptively in that,
as noted, students without 'talent' have a built in reason not to try.]
I've been reading this thread for a while now. I have always explained to my
students that we are all going down a path and that "talent" just means that you
start out further down the path than others. My father is an artist and so am I
and people who are not artists are always going on about how "talented" we are
with a total disregard for all the work that goes into each of our pieces. Yes,
I have a natural disposition for this kind of work, but that is not what gets
paintings painted or sculptures made - it is time, devotion, and committment.
Symphonies do not get written just because someone has talent, the composer has
to learn what makes music good, what each instrument sounds like, and take the
many hours to put it on paper.
I'd much rather have someone appreciate the amount of work that has gone into my
work, or ask me what I was thinking when I made it, or tell me how it makes them
feel than tell me how talented I am. I may be talented, but I work really really
hard to do what I do.
---
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jul 01 2000 - 22:47:24 PDT