Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
Re: IS "ART ED" IS STILL AN ANOMALY?
Mon, 5 Jan 1998 05:57:13 -0700 (MST)
- Next message: Bunki Kramer: "Re: THE ART ADVOCATE...my views.."
- Previous message: Robert Beeching: "IS "ART ED" IS STILL AN ANOMALY?"
- Maybe in reply to: Robert Beeching: "IS "ART ED" IS STILL AN ANOMALY?"
Robert Beeching wrote:
>I have come to the conclusions: 1) Art Educations has little to do with
>art training, 2) Most Elementary classroom teachers have no training in
>art, 3) College arted professors are dealing with issues other than art
>training, and 4) Four generations of "non-art" teaching has left not
>only the students, but their teachers and parents with a misconception
>of what art training can be!
To get a more crystallized idea, could you put down what constitutes 'art
training' , as you use the concept. I can almost get a grasp -- are you
referring purely to art production techniques?
Deborah
- Next message: Bunki Kramer: "Re: THE ART ADVOCATE...my views.."
- Previous message: Robert Beeching: "IS "ART ED" IS STILL AN ANOMALY?"
- Maybe in reply to: Robert Beeching: "IS "ART ED" IS STILL AN ANOMALY?"