Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
The point is well-taken that not all schools have access to museums. I
like the idea of bringing in your own work-this must take considerable
There is also the argument that exposure to originals - even medicore
ones - is preferable to repeoductions of the so-called "great works."
rosenfka.edu "ART IS NOT OPTIONAL"
University of Cincinnati - Art Education -printed on rock
outside the Art
Academy of Cincinnati
On Fri, 12 Jan 1996, Thom Maltbie wrote:
> Sorry to butt in,(this is a discussion, though). I've been teaching for ten
> years at a rural school (60 miles from Cincinnati) and therefore the
> collections are not accessible. I've discovered that kids, especially
> younger ones (we can't all teach high school), do not understand the
> inherent abstraction of the reproduction from its respective "real" work of
> art. I have, literally, thousands of electronic and paper reproductions
> which pale in comparison to a trip to the museum (we don't take those
> trips). My feeling is that this problem is partially overcome by (1) the
> "teacher as artist" and "art room as studio" switches (sometimes the
> teacher has to have a meaningful and high level involvement with his/her
> own studio work right there in the school) and (2) local artists and art
> works (no matter how good) must be used as examples so that the students
> understand the involved media and techniques. Keep discussing this, I
> struggle with this and my own work as an artist.
> Thom Maltbie
> South Ripley Elementary School
> Versailles, IN