Re: No Child Left Behind

From: dawn stien (dawnstien_at_TeacherArtExchange)
Date: Thu Jan 30 2003 - 19:18:26 PST

• Next message: Marand10_at_TeacherArtExchange: "Thanks Judy Decker"
• Previous message: Elizheisey_at_TeacherArtExchange: "active learning"
• Maybe in reply to: Renee.Berg_at_TeacherArtExchange: "No Child Left Behind"
• Next in thread: Nnaell_at_TeacherArtExchange: "Re: No Child Left Behind"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Is the No Child Left Behind a Bush program?
Wasn't Gaols 2000?

I've been trying to figure out why No child Left
Behind became so important and Goals 2000 is
apparently irrelevant in 2003...

I haven't read all of this thread because I get soooo
frustrated and would much rather read about artists
that I'll be teaching about...Is the bottom line
really that there is grant money tied to No Child Left
Behind and not to Goals 2000?

Maybe this is obvious to everyone else - but I'm new
to public ed and I am baffled about how decisions are
made...

Dawn in Houston

 
--- STeacherkipp@aol.com wrote:
> Hi Aaron,
> I've been asked several times this week if I'm
> interested in being the Reading Mentor for our
> school if we get the challenge grant, since they
> will most probably eliminate my visual arts
> position

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

---

• Next message: Marand10_at_TeacherArtExchange: "Thanks Judy Decker"
• Previous message: Elizheisey_at_TeacherArtExchange: "active learning"
• Maybe in reply to: Renee.Berg_at_TeacherArtExchange: "No Child Left Behind"
• Next in thread: Nnaell_at_TeacherArtExchange: "Re: No Child Left Behind"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]