Re: matting questtion? - Ricardo

From: Ricardo Ramirez (rramirez2_at_TeacherArtExchange)
Date: Thu Jan 16 2003 - 19:02:07 PST

• Next message: Bunki Kramer: "Re: anamorphic art - other examples"
• Previous message: Bunki Kramer: "Re: o'keeffe flowers"
• Maybe in reply to: Sandy Bacon: "Re: matting questtion? - Ricardo"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Thanks to all for your advice on the matting issue. The artwork was
heading to Austin, Tx for YAM selection.

Ricardo

>>> sbacon@ix.netcom.com 01/16/03 05:15PM >>>
The old rule of thumb was to make the bottom of the mat wider than the

other three equal sides. I started working for a professional framer
over 10 years ago, and only on special occasions did we cut the bottom

wider. You don't want your mat to overwhelm the piece. So, I would
suggest looking at maybe 2 and 1/2 all the way around, or 3 if you are

planning on framing it with a larger width frame. See how it looks --

after all, you will be the best judge -- it's kinda personal. Have
fun!

Sandy

Ricardo Ramirez wrote:

>What dimensions should I matte a 14" x 20" drawing? 3 inches for top
>and sides and 3 ½ inches at the bottom?
>
>Ricardo
>
>---
leave-artsednet-20359V@lists.getty.edu
>
>
>

---
leave-artsednet-20359V@lists.getty.edu
---

• Next message: Bunki Kramer: "Re: anamorphic art - other examples"
• Previous message: Bunki Kramer: "Re: o'keeffe flowers"
• Maybe in reply to: Sandy Bacon: "Re: matting questtion? - Ricardo"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]