Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
I don't have any personal experience with charter schools, so I may be
out of line here. But my opinion is that we, the schools, are trying to
change what we cannot change. What I mean is that many MANY of the
problems come to us from the home and have little or nothing to do with
how we are doing things. So many kids have never been told NO, or
given any limits. Both parents work and they don't want to spend the
precious little time with their kids being "parents." They treat their
kids like equals, like adults, and so when they come to school and are
expected to function within a group, with rules to benefit the common
good, they freak out. Not to mention the other problems, like
abuse/neglect, etc. I teach in a small district (that is rapidly
growing, unfortunately) and we still have our share of "spoiled" kids
who can't function. Luckily, in a class of 14 - 18 kids, it's easier to
help those kids transition and be able to get the others to model good
behavior. When you get 25 - 30 kids in a class and 10 of them are not
already "socialized" (for lack of a better word), you have a problem on
your hands. So I guess, bottom line, is that the only (or best) way to
improve schools, whether charter or public, would be to reduce class
size. Unfortunately, that costs money and that seems to be the hardest
thing to come by in this business...
teri
---
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 19 2000 - 14:05:04 PST