Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
The management thing
Thu, 12 Feb 1998 21:03:34 +0800
- Next message: wendy sauls: "Re: art & science"
- Previous message: Robert Nickelson: "Re: art & science"
>Kevin Wrote, and I really hope for the last time:
>> Some do, many do not.
>> Thanks for the chance to , once again (and the last time), respond.
>> Kevin
>I love to read the postings here, but the tone of Kevin's postings, and
>luckily for me, I missed some, is really hectoring and as Karen put it
>"top-lofty". Mellow out up there in that Ivory Tower.
>Charlotte Griswold
>DENIAL IS NOT A RIVER IN EGYPT
Oh Charlotte, please know that you don't speak for everyone.I have enjoyed
this debate so much--it's the first time I've seen classroom management
issues really debated on the list. Have you ever watched a full-fledged
debate? Debaters do get testy, do challenge eachother in potentially
personal ways. I think that every person who responded to this issue is
entirely correct in terms of their own context. You do what you can, the
best you can. There is nothing wrong with suggestions that what we do can
be done better. Certainly that's what we tell our students. Kevin's
insights are extremely valuable to me as are all the other suggested ways
of dealing with disruption. Thanks everyone, and I hope Kevin we havn't
heard from you or anyone else for the last time. Peggy
- Next message: wendy sauls: "Re: art & science"
- Previous message: Robert Nickelson: "Re: art & science"