Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
Is "doing art" not an avenue of expressing one's feelings, emotions and
convictions? I cannot but advocate a strong positive feeling for the inclusion
of Studio experience in the curriculum of teaching art. To not do so seems
like leading two to the altar whose expectations of marriage are built on a
traditional set of beliefs, where the authoritative figure, needed to allow
them to legally combine both their past experiences and dreams for a satisfied
future, cancels the event telling the parties that the uniting of past
experiences and creative dreams is non-essential. One is convinced by the
authoritative figure that he need not dream and create because he can enrich
his life solely with experiences from the past. The other is told that there
is little value in studying past experiences for it is not essential in order
to tap into the creative self and produce from your unconscious dreams.
While this might be acceptable to some, it seems to me that, "Learning
About Art" from past experience and "Making Art" in the studio are being
advised to go their separate ways. This is not reading, "Life's meaning in
each other's eyes." (Fate by Susan Marr Spalding) To this Artist who is
preparing to become an art educator, it is almost unthinkable to separate the
HOW DO SOME OF YOU FEEL ABOUT THE STUDIO APPROAC???????????