Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
Re: RE: GAY RIGHTS & CHILDREN!
From: Artystyc3
Date: Fri Feb 11 2000 - 21:06:01 PST
- Previous message: Numo Jaeger & Michael Miller: "Re: Mask exhibition in Oakland, CA"
- Maybe in reply to: Lawrence A. Parker/OCCTI: "RE: GAY RIGHTS & CHILDREN!"
- Next in thread: Inland Lakes Schools: "Re: GAY RIGHTS & CHILDREN!"
- Next in thread: Rosa Juliusdottir: "Re: GAY RIGHTS & CHILDREN!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Larry-
You must realize that Mapplethorp and Michaelangelo are on opposite ends of
the nudity issue.
Mapplethorp is easily recognizable as a deviant, with obvious sexual
overtones to his work.
Michaelangelo wasn't pious ,yet he displayed pure spiritual beauty in the
human form without a focus on sexual content. When a work of art is spiritual
it transcends any sexual issue, because it elevates the thoughts beyond the
physical form to the highest form of created beauty.
I won't argue each ones validity, but they are not on the same plane.
---
- Next message: Holly112: "Re: A New Question to Ponder"
- Previous message: Numo Jaeger & Michael Miller: "Re: Mask exhibition in Oakland, CA"
- Maybe in reply to: Lawrence A. Parker/OCCTI: "RE: GAY RIGHTS & CHILDREN!"
- Next in thread: Inland Lakes Schools: "Re: GAY RIGHTS & CHILDREN!"
- Next in thread: Rosa Juliusdottir: "Re: GAY RIGHTS & CHILDREN!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 11 2000 - 21:08:12 PST