Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
Re: Sight or sound?
Tue, 7 Dec 1999 11:57:16 -0500
- Next message: Lawrence A. Parker/OCCTI: "Virus Warning: W32.Mypics.Worm"
- Previous message: Hansgen, Nuit: "RE: Pit firing"
- Maybe in reply to: Aaron and Jennifer: "Sight or sound?"
> > There are many "substitutes" for hearing and speech, but none for sight.
>
> Not at all true! There's touch--often more telling than sight--
>
Touch is an additional sense which conveys information different from sight.
We cannot touch color, nor is it operational at a distance.
On the contrary, we can continue to communicate, lacking hearing and speech,
through hand signals and other body language.
Not to diminish the importance of touch - especially on the interpersonal
level!
Lar
--- You are currently subscribed to artsednet as: hm-aen.edu To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-artsednet-4261K
- Next message: Lawrence A. Parker/OCCTI: "Virus Warning: W32.Mypics.Worm"
- Previous message: Hansgen, Nuit: "RE: Pit firing"
- Maybe in reply to: Aaron and Jennifer: "Sight or sound?"
- Next in thread: Joseph Augusta: "Re: Sight or sound?"