R. Moore wrote: > > Dear Joseph, > I fully agree that geese are beautiful, both in their appearance > and in their actions; but being beautiful doesn't in itself qualify > something as art. Mount Ranier is beautiful; but it isn't art ...
True, but the mountain isn't alive--and animals are--big difference.
You're confusing art with the art object. Try this: form a definition
of art in your mind--art with a capital A if you must, and apply your
definition to your beautiful geese. Then open up a little. Does it