Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
>There is no way that an artist, whether student or professional, should be made
>or even asked to share part of a sales price with an influential person. Yes,
>the teacher definitely has an input into the finished work, but that input does
>not constitute ownership. What about a professional artist who is doing a
>series based upon the works of Van Gogh or Picasso? If he is not copying, but
>merely working "in the manner of" these artists, should he have to pay Van Gogh
>or Picasso's heirs a fee? Should Childe Hassam have paid a commission to
>Claude Monet every time he sold a painting?
>Also, if a teacher was worried about giving away "secrets" each time they
>taught a class, how would they teach? The teacher is paid for teaching the
>class, leave it at that.