Yes, I agree enthusiastically. Many of my friends do not consider
themselves as artists yet they create incredible pieces. Silently, like
kind cooks and gardeners, they give their work to people at special times,
never calling attention to their work. Maybe their stuff doesn't show up in
books and magazines or museums, but they are no less artistic for their
lack of recognition.
On 18 November, Judie J wrote:
Why not? Do we have to be formally trained in the arts to be considered an
"artist"? How about all of the naive and primitive artists whose work is
collected and in many museum collections?