Re: defending the "tight" painter

From: The Austin's (whest177_at_TeacherArtExchange)
Date: Sat Dec 15 2001 - 13:39:19 PST

• Next message: The Austin's: "Re: Bunki's "little books""
• Previous message: Deb Mortl: ""Tight" painting and AP studio art"
• Maybe in reply to: Geoffrey McClain: "defending the "tight" painter"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

The only complaint I have ever had about my "tight" painters (seems to carry
over into drawing as well), is that they seem to want to paint their "main
object", but ignore the background. I don't mind the "tight" as much as I
mind ignoring the overall composition.
~Michal

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.307 / Virus Database: 168 - Release Date: 12/11/01

• Next message: The Austin's: "Re: Bunki's "little books""
• Previous message: Deb Mortl: ""Tight" painting and AP studio art"
• Maybe in reply to: Geoffrey McClain: "defending the "tight" painter"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]