I do agree that you have to decide what works for you program. Portfolios
are an individual decision, as are how to deal with no sink, working on a
cart, distributing supplies, etc. I completely empathize with all these - I
teach in a variety of situations daily. Starting out in a dark room with no
sink, seeing grades 3-6 once a week for 45 min., to MS/HS in a large
well-lit art room with too many students, to a computer lab with computers
that constantly break down, to a primary art room with a large deep sink
that students can't reach, with 5 round tables and 27 students crowded
around with 20 min. to do some kind of art. What I have discovered is that
if something doesn't work smoothly and wastes time, then I need to think
about what isn't working and how to make it work more quickly and smoothly.
Portfolios are a blessing for me, cause I pick them up by table, so when it
is time to return them I can pick up the top 6 and give them to the correct
table - takes me less than 1 min. to distribute all portfolios and supplies.
If I worked mainly 3-D I would not use portfolios. As for the artwork losing
it's luster and kids forgetting or discarding the artwork, this has been
discussed several times before, and again, is a personal decision. I do not
find my students any less enthusiastic for waiting. Again, it is how you,
the teacher, approach this.
K-12 Kansas Art Teacher
> My own experience as an art teacher of 32 years has
> been that kids are most excited about the work they do
> in class when it is put on display, sent home in a
> timely fashion, or kept for the annual arts festival.
> Artwork that sits in a folder, especially for
> elementary kids, tends to lose its luster and is more
> likely to be discarded or forgotten. I hope this
> clears up things for those who feel I was demeaning
> their efforts, it was not meant to do so, just to
> state there was a different opinion out there. Hope
> this helps, Jerry