Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
on 8/9/00 3:37 PM, Michal at whest177 wrote:
> If your students were to leave your art class only knowing 5
> artists, which 5 would you consider the most important that they know?
> Which 5 would you be embarrassed if they did not know them? We roughly decided
> Michaelangelo, Rembrandt, VanGogh, and Picasso.
Hmmm.... All dead white guys, eh? Really, they are all worthy, and 5 seems
like an artificially low number, but do we really need 2 of the "Ninja
Turtles"? Let's replace DaVinci ( I hear the screams already!), and let
Michelangelo stand for the Renaissance. Then we could put in someone
(Hokusai?) who was influential on Van Gogh, and therefore Picasso. There
needs to be some recognition that the entirety of art history did not happen
in Europe - in fact, the idea that just a few (5?) "geniuses" subsume the
history of art is a very Eurocentric idea. Much of the best of the world's
art was done by anonymous artists or groups.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 10 2000 - 07:33:25 PDT