Note: To protect the privacy of our members, e-mail addresses have been removed from the archived messages. As a result, some links may be broken.
I might agree with you on any model UNDER the FD-83...but the quality
of the images on this camera are VERY good! The images are approximately
11" x 17" and when you reduce them to a normal size...and print them on a
good printer...they are near "perfect quality" and details are clear. I
highly recommend this camera and the "digital movies" are a plus!
Now the model under this one...I can't say the same for it.
>I have to disagree with the floppy-disk-using Mavica supporters. In order
>to fit images in such a small amount of storage space (a floppy disk) the
>Mavica sacrifices image quality. If you look at the digital camera
>comparson charts in zdnet.com and in the computer magazines, you'll notice
>that the Mavicas some in near the bottom in image quality. The Mavica is
>fine for webpages and snapshots, but for high-quality images that are meant
>to be printed, you really need another camera - one that uses a flashcard.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 17 2000 - 19:43:28 PDT