|
By Barbara Roberts
 |
The damaged head of a wooden sculpture of St. Anthony,
evacuated from a church in Pridvorje, a town near Dubrovnik,
Croatia. Photo: Barbara Roberts. |
In October 1993, the International Council of Museums (ICOM), with
financial support from the Getty Conservation Institute, conducted
a mission to the Republic of Croatia. Requested by members of ICOM,
the ICOM National Committee of Croatia, and UNESCO, the mission's
purpose was to survey damage to Croatian museums, galleries, and
collections caused by the war of 1991 to 1993 and to identify what
assistance is most needed.
As the ICOM member who carried out the 1993 mission, I returned
from Croatia with vivid images of systematic destruction. Major
works of art, many historic structures, and whole towns and villages
with centuries of history have been destroyed or damaged almost
beyond recognition. I saw houses that had been rendered uninhabitable
by tanks, buildings demolished by land mines, and structures with
rocket, howitzer, grenade, and shrapnel damage, some with faded
UNESCO flags still flyingflags that offered no protection. A
number of people interviewed believed that the flags actually drew
fire.
Within Croatia are 143 institutions with 86 branch collections,
containing approximately five million cultural objects. At the end
of 1993, 47 of these institutions had experienced either direct
damage or losses to their collections. This number could well be
higher. The country's Museum Documentation Center (MDC) has little
or no information for 8 of the 17 museums and galleries in Serbian-occupied
Croatia. These 17 collections housed about 200,000 items.
The difficult plight of those caring for cultural property in Croatia
has not changed appreciably since the mission occurred. Arts personnel,
exhausted from the effects of permanent duty with insufficient food
and wages slashed by inflation, face constant stress from a political
situation that refuses to settle into peace. Many have died or are
missing. There is, for instance, still no information on the fate
of Professor Petrovic, art historian of Vukovar.
It is in Vukovar that the worst losses to museums and galleries
occurred. Since its capture by Serbian forces, the contents of the
town's museumsthe Bauer Collection, the Vukovar Municipal Museum,
the History Museum and the Ruzicka Memorial Museumhave either
been destroyed or removed to Serbia. The buildings housing the last
three collections were listed as national monuments; according to
Croatian sources, they were all heavily damaged.
 |
A war-damaged fountain in the streets of
Dubrovnik. Photo: Barbara Roberts. |
While in Croatia, I was shown a recording of a Serbian television
program in which the Serbian Minister of Culture was discussing
the major works removed from church buildings in Vukovar. The objects
are purportedly being held "for conservation and safekeeping and
will be returned to a rebuilt home in Vukovar at the end of the
war." The ICOM Advisory Board Committee, meeting in Paris in June
1994, recommended that the Council of Europe and ICOM conduct a
joint mission to Croatia and Yugoslavia to discuss the fate of the
Vukovar collections.
During the 1993 mission I spoke with numerous brave and dedicated
museum personnel, librarians, government staff, monks, and private
citizens who have individually or in small groups, amid a brutal
war, managed to protect the greater part of the movable cultural
property within Croatia's borders. Through their efforts, relatively
few of the nation's collections sustained direct damage.
However, despite success in removing many public collections from
the dangers of warfare and seizure, these collections remain threatened.
The finest of Croatia's national collectionincluding works from
the Neolithic period, antiquity, the Renaissance, the 17th and 18th
centuries, and the modern agehave been placed in storage sites
that lack climate control, sufficient shelving, and, in many instances,
decent roofing. These repositories are now a major cause for concern.
Within the first weeks of hostilities, the country was denuded of
packing supplies, and the result is that few objects are adequately
protected. Serious damage is occurring from high humidity, extreme
temperatures, insects, rodents, and a lack of resources to retrofit
storage areas and conduct basic treatments. Storage areas are jammed
with collections material, and handling space is limited.
The scarcity of museum guardians and the virtual nonexistence of
alarm systems pose a genuine problem for the security of evacuated
materials. There is a clear risk of theft. The international museum
community should be on guard for objects from Croatia appearing
on the art market.
Neither the Ministry of Education and Culture, the Institute for
the Protection of Cultural Monuments, or the MDC have vehicles equipped
for the transportation of artworks. Works cannot be exhibited or
moved in safety until there is regional peace. Much of Croatia is
still occupied by Serbian forces, and only the United Nations Protection
Forces stand between the two sides. The UN may choose to withdraw
from the area.
Small steps are being taken as a result of the ICOM mission report,
which was published by the Council of Europe in April 1994. The
American Association of Museums is planning an exchange initiative
to coincide with their 1995 annual meeting in Philadelphia. The
ICOM Conservation Committee has been requested to study how its
members can assist, and ICOM is appealing to all national committees
to do what they can to help. The ICOM National Committee of the
Netherlands has donated ten thousand French francs for further assistance
with ICOM's efforts in the region. In an independent effort, the
government of Bavaria has restored two rooms for work on polychrome
sculpture at the Château of Ludbreg in Slavonia, Croatia.
Colleagues abroad can support their hard-pressed counterparts in
the region by providing supplies for emergency preventive maintenance
treatments and subscriptions to professional publications, offering
opportunities for training, raising funds for transport vehicles,
and building informal contacts.
Once a peace agreement is signed, the region will require a major
initiative for the long-term reconstruction, conservation, and preservation
of cultural property. For international assistance to be effective,
priorities will need to be established by the government of Croatia,
in tandem with the Ministry of Education and Culture, the Institute
for Restoration, and individual institutions. Similar actions will
be necessary for the cultural property that remains in Bosnia-Herzegovina.
A disciplined, professional, and well-planned internal and international
joint effort can help save the diverse cultural property of the
region for the next millennium.
Barbara Roberts is a conservator and consultant based in Seattle,
Washington.
|
 |
|