|
By Eric Hansen and Mitchell Bishop
In a 1983 article describing the state of archaeological and ethnographic
collections, Professor Henry W. M. Hodges wrote: "If one compares
the truly vast literature in the field of oil painting, such as
the provision of supports, with that which has been written about
the treatment, say, of untanned skins or feather work, one will
see the latter is almost non-existent, and one can gauge how little
research is being done aimed at preserving our ethnographic collections."
Today, ten years later, the dearth of solutions to the conservation
problems of archaeological and ethnographic objects remains. The
search for answers is particularly urgent given the inherent impermanence
of these objects.
 |
Photo: Guillermo Aldana |
Most indigenous technologies used in the manufacture of ethnographic
objects did not produce physically durable objects. For example,
collections of objects such as painted wood artifacts from Oceania
or Africa are rarely more than two or three generations old because
they contain materials that deteriorate easily.
A major challenge in the conservation of ethnographic objects is
the consolidation of matte painted surfaces. Paints formulated with
a poor quality binder or a high ratio of pigment to binder are normally
matte in appearance. When, as is often the case, these paints are
in a powdery, friable, or flaking condition, the result is continual
paint loss. If a conservator treats a surface such as this with
a consolidant to improve the paint's cohesion, other problems can
arise. Consolidants frequently cause paint that is matte and light
in appearance to darken and discolor.
Unfortunately, technical literature on this topic is not readily
available. In 1990, the Getty Conservation Institute's Training
Program organized an advanced course, "The Consolidation of Painted
Ethnographic Objects," to address this problem. In anticipation
of the course, Institute staff evaluated existing technical literature,
surveyed over one hundred ethnographic conservators in the United
States and Canada, and implemented a program of scientific research
focusing on specific material and methodological problems.
One result of this research was the development of a low cost,
"low tech" kit for the identification of binding media. Based on
analytical kits originally used for medical purposes, the "Binding
Media Identification Kit" does not require the use of sophisticated
chemical or physical instrumentation, and can be assembled and resupplied
with materials available from laboratory supply houses.
Subsequent to the 1990 course, the Institute's in-house scientific
research on the subject was further refined. This research indicated
that the treatment method (and factors affecting the treatment method)
were more important in matte paint conservation than the consolidant
chosen for a specific application. Specifically, new methods were
explored that promoted the distribution of the consolidant throughout
the paint surface in the initial application.
A description of this technique will appear in an article to be
published in the Spring 1993 issue of the Journal of the American
Institute of Conservation. Details regarding the GCI's "Binding
Media Identification Kit" were provided in an article in the
Journal's Fall/Winter 1992 issue. While the methods described
in both articles grow out of research on ethnographic artifacts,
they are applicable to treatment problems in areas of conservation
other than ethnographic ones.
Another addition to the literature will appear this year when
Art and Archaeology Technical Abstracts (a publication of the
Getty Conservation Institute, in association with the International
Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works) publishes
a supplemental bibliography titled Matte Paint: Its History and
Technology, Analysis, Properties, Deterioration and Treatment (With
Special Emphasis on Ethnographic Objects). The bibliography
brings together material from a number of areas including anthropology,
archaeology, ethnobotany, artists' notes and interviews, contemporary
art journals, organic chemistry, coatings science, analytical chemistry,
and the conservation literature.
As recognition of the importance of ethnographic collections grows,
concern over the state of their preservation will likely increase.
The conservation community will need to continue exploring new techniques
if we are to protect this essential part of our collective cultural
heritage.
Eric Hansen is an Associate Scientist in the GCI's Scientific
Program. Mitchell Bishop is a Research Assistant in the GCI's Documentation
Program.
|