|
Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology
 |
Photo: Susan Zweigle |
At the Materials Research Society's annual spring meeting, held
this year in San Francisco, the Getty Conservation Institute and
the Smithsonian Institution sponsored their third symposium on "Materials
Issues in Art and Archaeology." The symposium, which ran from April
27 to May 1, 1992, was organized by James Druzik of the GCI, Pamela
Vandiver of the Conservation Analytical Laboratory of the Smithsonian
Institution, George Wheeler of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and
Ian Freestone of the British Museum.
Nearly 100 papers and posters were presented during the five-day
symposium. Topics covered in the sessions included: treatment, deterioration,
and structures in architectural materials; techniques for technical
analysis; behavior of materials used by the artist, artisan, and
conservator; and technical analysis of art and archaeological materials,
metallurgy, glass, and ceramics.
In light of recent armed conflicts around the world, there was
also a session on the protection and loss of cultural heritage during
warfare. The session was addressed by Miguel Angel Corzo, Director
of the GCI (see below).
The proceedings of the symposium will be published by the Materials
Research Society.
Speaking to a session of the Materials Research Society's third
symposium on "Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology,"
Miguel Angel Corzo, Director of the GCI, explored ways of strengthening
the 1954 UNESCO Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property
in the Event of Armed Conflict. In explaining the necessity for
action, he told symposium participants: "It is not our business
at this meeting to comment on the means by which the ultimate warthe
war against itselfmay be won. But it is valid to ask why we
should spend time and resources to safeguard art and culture in
periods of armed conflict when precious human lives are at risk.
Let me state that my personal and primary concern as a human being
is the survival of human life. Our task as conservation professionals,
on the other hand, is the protection of the human spirit as it manifests
itself in the tangible, artistic products of culture. To the devil's
advocate who would mischeviously quote Oscar Wilde that art is useless,
I would reply that useless it is indeedif we were to judge
the matter from a purely utilitarian perspective. Art is in fact
as useless to society as the spirit is to the body. The human species
as a biological organism can survive without art and culture but
the definition of what it is to be human cannot. Culture is to human
civilization as trees are to the environment. That is the justification
for our preoccupation with its survival."
|
 |

|